From: "Alexandre Devaure" <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <8AyN4.3395$fv3 DOT 5373032 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net>
Subject: Re: attribute stdcall
Lines: 31
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Message-ID: <2HyN4.3398$JA3.5430288@nnrp6.proxad.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:30:38 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.51.236.59
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT proxad DOT net
X-Trace: nnrp6.proxad.net 956741438 194.51.236.59 (Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:30:38 CEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:30:38 CEST
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


Alexandre Devaure <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com> a écrit dans le
message : 8AyN4.3395$fv3 DOT 5373032 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net...
> Has sombody ever had compilation problem with a function declared with the
> attribute stdcall with gcc 2.95?
>
> static bool F_WriteWords(int *_VP_Addr,int _V_Off,int _V_Lng)
> __attribute__((stdcall));
> static bool F_WriteWords(int *_VP_Addr,int _V_Off,int _V_Lng)
> {
>     body
> }
>
> the result is :
> bmra.c:120: previous declaration of `F_WriteWords'
> bmra.c:165: conflicting types for `F_Init'
>
> If I remove the attribute, the compilation is ok.
>
> TIA
> Alex
>
>
>

I am sorry, the good message is :
bmra.c:125: conflicting types for `F_WriteWords'
bmra.c:120: previous declaration of `F_WriteWords'