Message-ID: <39045ED0.3F417452@dasoft.org>
From: Tom St Denis <tom AT dasoft DOT org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: WDOSX
References: <38ff20bd$0$58948 AT SSP1NO17 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 25
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:44:59 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.42.86.123
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT home DOT net
X-Trace: news2.rdc1.on.home.com 956587499 24.42.86.123 (Mon, 24 Apr 2000 07:44:59 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 07:44:59 PDT
Organization: @Home Network Canada
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com



Florian X wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Has somebody tried WDOSX? Is it better if I use it or  CWSDPMI?
> 
> WDOSX is a DOS extender, which some features, look at:
> http://www.wuschel.demon.co.uk/
> 
> Bye, Florian

It's a really stable dos extender two main features over CWSDPMI

1)  Compressed executables
2)  It binds directly into your program, so no 'two exe' distributions

The cons:

1)  No virtual memory
2)  If you actually distribute more then one exe CWSDPMI takes less
space.

Tom