From: buers AT gmx DOT de (Dieter Buerssner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Followup-To: poster
Date: 18 Apr 2000 04:30:55 GMT
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <8dgvat.3vvqu6v.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004180455310 DOT 1540-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <38FBB719 DOT 3915C530 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pec-114-33.tnt7.s2.uunet.de (149.225.114.33)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 956032255 8167502 149.225.114.33 (16 [17104])
X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/1.3.13.0
User-Agent: Xnews/03.02.04
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

[followup set]

Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

>Yes, we have proved. We also haven't trow away all my inline ASM. The
>FIDIVRL trick is still alive. :)

Wrong. Put the source I sent you on your homepage, so everybody still
interested can judge. I stand by my claim, that I have disabled
*all* your inline assembly in T_Map(), and got the same FPS.