From: Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date: 16 Apr 2000 16:54:33 -0700
Organization: InterWorld Communications
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <83em85mwjq.fsf@mercury.st.hmc.edu>
References: <38F98775 DOT E0FB9148 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <83vh1hn60e DOT fsf AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: nntp1.interworld.net 955929539 17936 134.173.45.219 (16 Apr 2000 23:58:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Apr 2000 23:58:59 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu> writes:

> "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru> writes:
> 
> > By *official* I mean correct/valid description of inline
> > asm. I.e. one that doesn't make you to correct my inline asm as you
> > were doing all the time. :)
> 
> The section in the GCC manual is as effective as it gets.  When that

Err, as *official* as it gets, I meant to say.

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu