Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:22:26 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Help with Inline ASM...
In-Reply-To: <38FAA555.2C9083AB@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000417102032.14867G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> Damian Yerrick wrote:
> > Wasn't the "flat model" discussed before here?  I think we called
> > DJGPP's model a "32-bit tiny model."
> 
> Well, what's the actual difference of these terms in your opinion?

Damian refers to the same discussion I mentioned earlier in this thread.  
In that discussion, the differences between these terms were beaten to 
death, several times.

In addition, I explained, again, why DJGPP's memory model is not flat
in this thread yesterday.