From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: [Fwd: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem] Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 13:33:11 +0400 Organization: MTU-Intel ISP Lines: 25 Message-ID: <38F988D7.8752D89C@mtu-net.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp97-187.dialup.mtu-net.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 955887122 21507 212.188.97.187 (16 Apr 2000 12:12:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Apr 2000 12:12:02 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ru To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:21:03 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Alexei A. Frounze" On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote: > By *official* I mean correct/valid description of inline asm. I.e. one that > doesn't make you to correct my inline asm as you were doing all the time. :) I don't think anybody will be able to guarantee absolutely correct documentation. The docs and tutorials cited in the FAQ are the best we know of. If they have errors, please submit patches. If you find better docs, please post their URLs, and I will add them to the FAQ. A URL of one other good tutorial was posted a few weeks ago to the news group. You could look it up by searching the archives at http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/. In general, inline assembly is notoriously underdocumented. So it's no wonder you will have to learn a lot as you go.