From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 13:27:17 +0400 Organization: MTU-Intel ISP Lines: 21 Message-ID: <38F98775.E0FB9148@mtu-net.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp97-187.dialup.mtu-net.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 955887109 21507 212.188.97.187 (16 Apr 2000 12:11:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Apr 2000 12:11:49 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ru To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com By *official* I mean correct/valid description of inline asm. I.e. one that doesn't make you to correct my inline asm as you were doing all the time. :) Alexei A. Frounze ----------------------------------------- Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote: > > > Are there any official ones on the AT&T x86 asm syntax and inline asm? > > I'm not sure I understand what do you mean by ``official''. > > The DJGPP FAQ has some pointers to docs and tutorials about these > issues.