Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 09:55:58 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
In-Reply-To: <38F8975B.BB2AEC5@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000416095540.2482E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> Are there any official ones on the AT&T x86 asm syntax and inline asm?

I'm not sure I understand what do you mean by ``official''.

The DJGPP FAQ has some pointers to docs and tutorials about these
issues.