From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Tsr's how? Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:30:48 +0400 Organization: MTU-Intel ISP Lines: 29 Message-ID: <38F39988.5E220DD6@mtu-net.ru> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp98-177.dialup.mtu-net.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 955552964 52432 212.188.98.177 (12 Apr 2000 15:22:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Apr 2000 15:22:44 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ru To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Yes, real-mode TSR for DOS. IMHO writing such huge TSRs is a bit stupid. This may be good only for beginners. Btw, DPMI-based TSR is not a very good thing too. bye. Alexei A. Frounze ----------------------------------------- Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote: > > > I'd rather write it in pure ASM. Btw, I have one that saves screen (in text > > mode) to file SCR_XXXX. XXXX is a number of the screenshot. And it's increased > > after each save. > > > > Program in DJGPP would be about 70KB plus CWSDPMI. :)) > > Mine (in ASM) is 5KB. > > You mean, in real-mode assembly, right? > > Writing a program in assembly doesn't necessarily mean it is a non-DJGPP > program. If it is a DJGPP program, it will need the DJGPP startup code > and CWSDPMI, even if the program's source is pure assembly.