Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:48:34 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Dieter Buerssner <buers AT gmx DOT de>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: 'retf' in inline?
In-Reply-To: <8cr359.3vs6k6b.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000410084816.19649O@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On 9 Apr 2000, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

> >Yes, I agree this should be in the manual.  Feel like sending a patch?
> 
> I think, that people more familiar with the gcc innards and/or
> native English speakers could prepare better patches.

You seem to assume that people who wrote GCC docs know English better
than you do ;-).

> I prefer to patch source code.

IMHO, good and accurate docs is important more than the code.