From: "Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is DOS dead?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 11:09:26 -0400
Organization: Nortel Networks
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <38EB5725.18ABD810@americasm01.nt.com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004040520420 DOT 1275-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <38E9F66B DOT C241F764 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <7m8lescc82a758ergcj4k26c8uqkosev9q AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72C-CCK-MCD  [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Damian Yerrick wrote:

> >How hard would it be to make a executable with an embedded RPM image
> >so that when it was executed, it installed itself?  I doubt it would
> >be very hard, and I think that's the way rpm's should be done (it
> >looks much more attractive to Windows users)
> Or just automatically associate RPM archives with `rpm -U'.

What type of 'associatation' do you mean?  Wouldn't this have to be a
file-manager specific task?

--
(\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)