Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 05:31:11 +0600 (LKT) From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel X-Sender: root AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: help with a bit stream.... In-Reply-To: <38E8CBA9.C4D598FE@americasm01.nt.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH] wrote: > Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote: > > > I know that GIF's suck etc..But the problem is that animated GIF's are a > > great thing, and there is no other way to achive this other than using > > large amounts of Javascript to do the animations... > > > > Also on this PNG VS GIF subject, how many browsers support transparent > > PNG's? > > > > So unfortunately we have no choice but to use GIF's whenever we want a > > transparent image, or a animation... :-( > > Well, you could invent 'animated PNG' format, then add the code to the > mozilla project along with transparent PNG support. Well this would be pointless if Internet Exploder doesn't decide to support it too. As it is IE that calls the shots in the browser market now... :-( BTW It still is simpler using animated gif's, no matter what some people might say... Kalum Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread :)