From: "Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: help with a bit stream....
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 12:49:45 -0400
Organization: Nortel Networks
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <38E8CBA9.C4D598FE@americasm01.nt.com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10003310513470 DOT 985-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72C-CCK-MCD  [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

> I know that GIF's suck etc..But the problem is that animated GIF's are a
> great thing, and there is no other way to achive this other than using
> large amounts of Javascript to do the animations...
>
> Also on this PNG VS GIF subject, how many browsers support transparent
> PNG's?
>
> So unfortunately we have no choice but to use GIF's whenever we want a
> transparent image, or a animation... :-(

Well, you could invent 'animated PNG' format, then add the code to the
mozilla project along with transparent PNG support.

--
(\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)