Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 22:35:32 +0500 Message-Id: <200004021735.WAA01442@midpec.com> From: Prashant TR To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (message from Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel on Sun, 2 Apr 2000 18:04:31 +0600 (LKT)) Subject: Re: Is DOS dead? References: Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel proclaimed: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Prashant TR wrote: > > > james archer proclaimed: > > > > > > That really depends on the type of programs that need to be run. Linux can't > > > > be a solution to everything. > > > > > > Yes it can. :o) > > > > Oh, yeah. Then try writing a program to find the speed of your L1 and L2 > > caches (a reliable program). > > > And btw, I use Linux, too. But there are a few things like this that > > you can't do (or at least they are very hard to do) on Linux due to > > the nature of the OS. > > I wonder what these thing are and how much of these "things that you cant > do" are relevant for the real world user of linux. "These things" are just what I quoted above ;-). Agreed that these things aren't for a normail user. But IIRC, the original poster said "I adore DOS". He didn't say "I adore NT". So, let's talk DOS and Linux.