From: "Ben Davis" <ben AT vjpoole DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Reverse-compiler
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 07:31:53 +0100
Organization: Customer of Planet Online
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <8c457a$162$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>
References: <8c3eae$j1l$1 AT news6 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-37.carafate.dialup.pol.co.uk
X-Trace: news7.svr.pol.co.uk 954570794 1218 62.136.84.37 (1 Apr 2000 06:33:14 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Apr 2000 06:33:14 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Never mind. It was only an installation program, and a lot of the code (eg
GUI) is duplicated in another source file. I can retrieve the text strings
from the executable. It shouldn't take too long to rewrite. In the future, I
will keep backups before I start invoking GCC manually; but I should point
out to anyone concerned that GCC should *not* have deleted a source file.

Oh, by the way, I forgot to mention: I do have an object file, if it's any
use.

Ben Davis