Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 06:18:37 +0500
Message-Id: <200004010118.GAA01113@midpec.com>
From: prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com (Prashant TR)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <05d34b2c.fc4eeff7@usw-ex0105-036.remarq.com> (message from
	batchex on Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:06:59 -0800)
Subject: Re: VBE question
References: <054a4830 DOT 80e90c42 AT usw-ex0105-036 DOT remarq DOT com> <200003300638 DOT LAA00861 AT midpec DOT com> <05d34b2c DOT fc4eeff7 AT usw-ex0105-036 DOT remarq DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

batchex <thedark1NOthSPAM AT phreaker DOT net DOT invalid> proclaimed:

> Yes it is. But IMHO, __djgpp_map_physical_memory is doing the
> similar thing as the DPMI function. My question is, how to use
> the address returned by those functions.

I don't see any address being returned in __djgpp_map_physical_memory. You
just have to use the our_addr field to access the address you need. Please
read the documentation in libc.info ("info libc alpha").

So if you need to access the physical address phys_addr, use x = our_addr[0];

__djgpp_map_physical_memory(void *our_addr, unsigned long num_bytes,
				 unsigned long phys_addr);