From: Damian Yerrick Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Not-emulators (was AMD processors and assembly language) Organization: Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ Message-ID: References: <6ck4dsobcertrd67t6qnet26gti0uq191v AT 4ax DOT com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 X-Trace: /KDWjZe/PkbRIYTwCEtwuuwDPpwKuoxFTAaoOolOcUyveuKvEDuFdqNyii5MlP7LrnsE02zHZFb+!s/FdQvZsYJhUWflgbxJwwwqxPHyI4GhTQ+412rdxLECpjmJjhZNpfDcLmLn39zZA5wMaigXJvKub!qk312+c= X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 17:32:30 GMT Distribution: world Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 17:32:30 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Sun, 19 Mar 2000 13:36:08 GMT, "AndrewJ" wrote: >> To me, an "emulator" is something that translates one machine >> language to another on the fly (either by interpreting or dynamic >> recompilation). For example, NES and Java programs run on emulators. > >But Java doesn't really have it's own machine language, it's bytecode. i386 executable code is also a code made of bytes, a bytecode. >So Java programs don't really run under an emulator, they run under an >interpreter, right? What's the dif? There are interpretive emulators and dynarec (dynamic recompilation) emulators. >Unless they have made a native Java processor when I wasn't looking? The Sun Java chips? Look for MicroJava and UltraJava. -- Damian Yerrick http://yerricde.tripod.com/ Comment on story ideas: http://home1.gte.net/frodo/quickjot.html AOL is sucks! Find out why: http://anti-aol.org/faqs/aas/ View full sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your .sig to prevent the spread of .sig viruses. http://www.mcafee.com/