From: Michael Tippach Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Is DOS dead? Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 12:41:07 +0100 Organization: . Lines: 17 Message-ID: <38D4BCD3.767ACF49@gmx.net> References: <38C7D12E DOT 1E12 AT gmx DOT net> <38CD09B3 DOT 7373 AT gmx DOT net> <38CE19B2 DOT 69C7 AT gmx DOT net> <38CF7CED DOT 505A AT gmx DOT net> <38D0B4D1 DOT 380F AT gmx DOT net> <38D11897 DOT 2ED0 AT gmx DOT net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-212.162.1.110.frankfurt1.mik.net (212.162.1.110) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 953469087 4642021 212.162.1.110 (16 [12290]) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: [...] > > > One problem with NT that needs to be worked around is that NT ignores the > > > hight 16 bits of the user procedure address that is installed as a > > > real-mode callback (e.g., for handling mouse events). > > > > Does Win2K behave the same? > > No, it seems that this particular bug doesn't exist in W2K. So would you agree that the go32 stub could be modified to perform a check? Michael