Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 05:22:05 +0600 (LKT)
From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
X-Sender: root AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Last Try to Upload DJGPP Benchmark
In-Reply-To: <200003171948.UAA20726@golum.inforg.uniovi.es>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003180519500.911-100000@darkstar.grendel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Javier Bardal Prieto wrote:

> I used gcc2.95.2 and Djgpp 2.03
> The compiler options are:
> 
> gcc -O9 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -m386 -mcpu=i386 -march=i386

Isn't O3 the highest of the -Ox options. I know that in pgcc you can use
-O6 but what about gcc 2.95.2?

So shouldn't -O9 be the same as -O3 as far as 2.95.2 is concerned.

Grendel

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)