From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DPMI 1.0 is supported?
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:39:00 +0200
Organization: NetVision Israel	
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <38D25194.61C1A2A2@is.elta.co.il>
References: <geRz4.37015$O3 DOT 405744 AT news DOT infostrada DOT it> <200003160026 DOT TAA30918 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <Y%mA4.7553$C24 DOT 45407 AT news DOT infostrada DOT it>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ras1-p18.rvt.netvision.net.il
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.netvision.net.il 953307446 26541 62.0.172.20 (17 Mar 2000 15:37:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Mar 2000 15:37:26 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,ru,hebrew
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Pierluigi Mirto wrote:
> 
> Since nobody provides DPMI 1.0, how can I use an alternative for "Set
> Extended Processor Handler Vector" func 0x212 ?

You cannot use function 0212h unless you have a DPMI 1.0 server.  There are a
couple of servers which support DPMI 1.0 (386Max and I think OS/2), but most
of them don't.  In particular, Windows 3.X and 9X only support DPMI 0.9.

The only alternative is to use function 0203h, which is supported by DPMI
0.9.

Why exactly do you need function 0212h?