From: "Ben Davis" <ben AT vjpoole DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Some dodgy FILE hackery
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 21:52:40 -0000
Organization: Customer of Planet Online
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <8arl5k$mdd$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>
References: <8amfqu$ue5$1 AT newsg2 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk> <ton0ds0gulcmokemm07i36op8bvg9d2bud AT 4ax DOT com> <834sa6r3v4 DOT fsf AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-15.deagol.dialup.pol.co.uk
X-Trace: newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk 953243636 22957 62.136.152.143 (16 Mar 2000 21:53:56 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Mar 2000 21:53:56 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge wrote in message <834sa6r3v4 DOT fsf AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu>...
>Damian Yerrick <Bullshitd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullshit> writes:
>
>> >I have to do the encryption manually; the built-in password function
>> >isn't secure enough.
>>
>> I know; it's xor.
>
>Note that if the decryption will be done on the user's machine, no
>encryption is really secure, since they can catch the data as it comes
>out of decryption.  A debugger would probably suffice for this.

Doesn't matter. By the time it comes out of encryption, nobody's going to
care (or notice) that it was ever encrypted. Before that they won't have
enough information, and they would be *VERY* lucky to find the pattern! :-)

Ben Davis