From: Alexey Zakhlestine Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: CGI Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:18:46 +0300 Organization: MTU-Intel ISP Lines: 9 Message-ID: <38CE6666.B253EA84@gs707.com> References: <38CE5FF3 DOT 50D45DAA AT home DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp101-101.dialup.mtu-net.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 953050747 2182 212.188.101.101 (14 Mar 2000 16:19:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Mar 2000 16:19:07 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: ru,en To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com I don't see principal difference between CGI-executable and simple-executable. In CGI you need to return "Content"-string, and optionally get parameters.... You can easily do that in C/C++, and it doesn't matter which compiler you use -- Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread :)