From: "Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: explicit instantiation
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 12:29:57 -0500
Organization: Nortel Networks
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <38C7DF95.46A2B38F@americasm01.nt.com>
References: <62C1FE9FAA1E4584 DOT 06111F9979572068 DOT FEC73EFB7A77FD10 AT lp DOT airnews DOT net> <8a7pnb$1pc$1 AT news DOT lth DOT se> <lhafcs4o4kfmo0nrthkj9t0gleokh6cj4v AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Damian Yerrick wrote:

> (lang question: lang group added)
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 10:08:52 +0100, "Niklas Pettersson"
> <npedt97@(nospam)student.vxu.se> wrote:
>
> >Maybe you should consider using class instead of typename.
> >It's shorter and a more common way for C++ programmers to express
> >themselfs.
>
> Does "class" instead of "typename" work with non-class primitive
> types such as int and float?

Yes.

--
(\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)