Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:05:04 -0500
Message-Id: <200002290205.VAA23602@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <POOIBIBBAEMGBCAA@my-deja.com> (ken_yap@my-deja.com)
Subject: Re: why isn't the FSEXT hook implemented for dup in 2.03?
References:  <POOIBIBBAEMGBCAA AT my-deja DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Is there a good reason why DJGPP will call a FSEXT read or write but
> not a dup?

Yeah.  Laziness.  It was a good reason back when we did it.  We
implemented then what we needed then.  Now we need more, so now we
implement more.