From: "Marcus" <mesthlm AT hem DOT passagen DOT se>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Prevent crash on free()
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:27:01 +0100
Organization: Telenordia
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <89e7oq$cmv$1@cubacola.tninet.se>
References: <89e5e3$8g1$1 AT cubacola DOT tninet DOT se> <89e72m$hpt$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.150.200.251
X-Trace: cubacola.tninet.se 951755354 13023 193.150.200.251 (28 Feb 2000 16:29:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT algo DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2000 16:29:14 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Sorry but that's my attitude :)
I do a library and I want a way to check if I can free the memory. Of course
I can ignore that. But how fun would it be with memory leaks?


--
/regards Marcus

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

"Hans-Bernhard Broeker" <broeker AT acp3bf DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote:

> That's the wrong attitude towards the problem. Don't use free()
> carelessly, and it won't crash on you. You're asking us how to cure
> the symptoms, instead of how to fix the disease they tell you about.
>