From: Damian Yerrick Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Fastest bitblt? Organization: Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ Message-ID: References: <83mebssig8p8d943fekqr2sgumh48ermno AT 4ax DOT com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 32 X-Trace: /bQNubzZKfvulqx6GIMLeg1NVBuJXsAfj48CGdCMbUJS3CfZVPDe85IlVc/TKGatDyeo8pdGHHH8!yUuy2d+x1yYqPGzv//RXdgiQSzylsm+j1Vxs24P+QkM7fLsiopHy6DaF2jKRcASUrG7GGkSXKgKJ!1sfE X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:26:44 GMT Distribution: world Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:26:44 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:05:57 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Damian Yerrick wrote: > >> Protected mode only provides a mechanism for memory protection; it >> doesn't require that operating systems provide such protection. > >Not true. Memory protection is built into protected mode, >at least to some degree. But an OS can entirely disable it (e.g. what Watcom DOS4GW or DJGPP nearptr do). >Access rights checking and segment-level protection are >always active, as they are inherent to PM. That is, unless the OS gives user programs access rights to all memory in one fell swoop, allowing them to overwrite the kernel. >Page-level protection is optional. And is how Windows 9x and NT do it IIRC. -- Damian Yerrick http://yerricde.tripod.com/ Comment on story ideas: http://home1.gte.net/frodo/quickjot.html AOL is sucks! Find out why: http://anti-aol.org/faqs/aas/ View full sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your .sig to prevent the spread of .sig viruses. http://www.mcafee.com/