From: Jason Green Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Undefined String::String Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 10:33:46 +0000 Organization: Customer of Planet Online Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <1105_950952758 AT wol> <1103_951019320 AT wol> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-66.lawrencium.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news7.svr.pol.co.uk 951043328 1481 62.136.71.66 (20 Feb 2000 10:42:08 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Feb 2000 10:42:08 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com gdefty AT ittglobal DOT net (Graeme Defty) wrote: > > If this is for a new project you may be better off using the standard > > string class (ie all lower case). You won't need libgpp for this. > This is indeed a new project and I would *love* to use a 'standard' string class, but I can't find it, > either in .h files or (using 'nm') in any of my libraries. Could you point me in the right direction? Yes, but you will kick yourself ;-) FWIW, I don't think that searching the headers or libraries is a good way to learn C++. You will end up using features specific to DJGPP or GCC and later you will have portability problems. Much better to get a good reference book. And as for the standard string class, brace yourself ... #include // Ouch! HTH, Jason. ps. please can you reduce your line length.