Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:34:46 -0500
Message-Id: <200002102234.RAA22091@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <via6ask53607luais7q8s4urq3gisdpmkh@4ax.com> (message from Damian
	Yerrick on Thu, 10 Feb 2000 21:21:31 GMT)
Subject: Re: random.c and the advertising clause of the old BSD license
References:  <via6ask53607luais7q8s4urq3gisdpmkh AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> According to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html the "advertising
> clause" has recently been removed from the BSD license, but random.c
> from the libc sources has not been updated to reflect this.  If I will
> be using random.c in projects in other compilers (I have to make the
> same pseudorandom numbers appear on all platforms), do I have to
> advertise UC Berkeley and its contributors?

I think you answered your own question.

Feel free to submit patches to fix the copyright statements.