Message-Id: <3.0.6.16.20000206164805.33c748cc@mail.cybercable.fr>
Organization: Michelle's Internet Service
X-Link: http://www.michelle-is.com/index.htm
X-Moto: Micr0$oft = What do you want to crash today?
X-Note: sending S P A M is a violation of german, french and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster.
X-Sender: starone AT mail DOT cybercable DOT fr
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (16)
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 16:48:05 +0100
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From: Michelle Konzack <starone AT cybercable DOT fr>
Subject: Re: [Win-Devel: M-MNC] Kompiling of 32Bit-Apps under Dos/Win
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000206151938.9563A@is>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 16 DOT 20000206103347 DOT 35cfbf10 AT mail DOT cybercable DOT fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hello Eli,

I have Borland C++ 4.0 Proffesssionel on my WfW 3.11 Development machine.
I can choose to compile Win32s programs.

I was thinking, that I can nor compile the DJGPP c++ program with the 
Borland compiler. Or I am wrong ???

The Win32s option in the Borlandcompiler let me make programs running in 
Win16 and Win32 properly.

Any suggestions ???

Oh yes, I have forgotten:   the mail-fetcher is a command-line program
                            which can executed by any (win)cron progs.

Michelle


At 15:20 06.02.2000 +0200, you wrote
--------> This was the original Message:
>
>On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
>> I have programmed a Mail-Fetcher for the Mail-Client Eudora.
>> 
>> It works very well under Dos, put all mails in the INBOX.MBX 
>> and Create the INBOX.TOC...
>> 
>> Now I like to use the program in Windows...
>> ...and I must change something (e.g., Winsock)
>
>Why do you think you need to change anything for it to work under 
>Windows?  AFAIK, it should work under Windows the same as it did under 
>DOS.
>
>
--------> The Reply begins not here, it is at the beginning ^