From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: posix threads with djgpp Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:17:23 +0000 Organization: Customer of Planet Online Lines: 21 Message-ID: <388F5653.D5C42ED2@tudor21.net> References: <388DD4EA DOT E8925EBE AT maths DOT unine DOT ch> <86loe8$kbv$1 AT gateway DOT qnx DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-43.vanadium.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 949087750 10051 62.136.22.43 (28 Jan 2000 19:29:11 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jan 2000 19:29:11 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. Damian Yerrick wrote: > >But not everyone is thread saavy, so the FAQ volume quadruple. > >There are people in this newsgroup strugling from DOS --> Un*x. Now > >imagine having to deal with Thread too ... I don't know if the > >advantage will be visible. > > Solution: two libc's. One is a "basic" libc for making "basic" DOS > apps; the other is an "advanced" libc for making threaded apps. This would be a complete nightmare - twice as much code to maintain! Somehow I can't see this happening - IMHO if anyone's that bothered, then they will probably switch to a different operating system, e.g. Linux, *BSD, or use a thread library and code to that instead. Bye, -- Richard Dawe richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/