From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: GCC bugs
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:02:34 +0200
Organization: NetVision Israel	
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <3885FC3A.E2827604@is.elta.co.il>
References: <01bf611a$9c6e9500$LocalHost AT alex> <3883BCC2 DOT 2CC1DCD9 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <01bf61c3$70f0a7c0$LocalHost AT alex> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000119113628 DOT 9609M-100000 AT is> <01bf627f$0b8075c0$LocalHost AT alex>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ras1-p72.rvt.netvision.net.il
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.netvision.net.il 948304946 10824 62.0.172.74 (19 Jan 2000 18:02:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jan 2000 18:02:26 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,ru,hebrew
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Alexei A. Frounze" wrote:
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> записано в статью
> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000119113628 DOT 9609M-100000 AT is>...
> > I doubt that it's a bug in GCC.  The problem description (different
> > sections in the object code) is too complex to be explained by a bug.
> 
> I know COFFs very well.

I didn't say you didn't know COFF.  I just said that a bug is generally not
smart enough to know about COFF.

> But I run command line and batch file in the same(!) directory. Futhermore,
> there are no any DJGPP scripts and such things in this directory. And I
> don't change anything, I just run GCC first way then second way.

I know that what I suggested might sound crazy, but so does the problem you
described.  When rational and simple explanations fail, it's time to try
irrational and not-so-simple ones ;-)

So: can you please search all your drives and directories for files named
djgpp.djl, and see how many of them do you have and how are they different?

Also, I understood earlier that you get different sections when compiling the
same source file.  Is that correct, or did I misunderstand you?