From: Charlie Subject: Re: gdb front-ends Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Message-ID: <0f5b83e7.416d0f21@usw-ex0107-041.remarq.com> Lines: 36 Bytes: 1382 X-Originating-Host: 155.64.60.106 Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here References: <000b8d9b DOT bd249425 AT usw-ex0102-016 DOT remarq DOT com> X-Wren-Trace: eFl8VFVMC0EKGllDSRxUXGtCRkhRXBBDElZZVxAcFUwYCU0WAUkCBgUO Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:48:44 -0800 NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.0.2.41 X-Complaints-To: wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com X-Trace: WReNphoon2 948232359 10.0.2.41 (Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:52:39 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:52:39 PST To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article , Eli Zaretskii wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Charlie wrote: > > What front ends are available for gdb to give an interface more > > like Visual C++? > Please read chapter 12 of the DJGPP FAQ list, it has some > recommendations for C++ debugging, especially in sections 12.1 and > 12.5. The FAQ doesn't address my question on gdb front ends, other than mentioning RHIDE and FSDB. > > I've used RHIDE up till now, but it seems a little flaky in > > debugging > Care to explain what problems did you see? We cannot help you > without knowing the details. ``Flaky'' is not enough. The main problem was that it won't always accept a breakpoint when I would expect a breakpoint to be valid. > > and doesn't appear to be maintained. > How so? A new beta was announced less than a month ago. My apologies, I looked at the last available version on simtel and observed that it hadn't been updated in over two years. I've now downloaded the beta and am trying it. It does seem to have fixed the problems I observed with the earlier version. If I find problems, I'll report them back to the author. Thanks for your help. * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!