From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: gdb front-ends Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:26:13 +0200 Organization: NetVision Israel Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <000b8d9b DOT bd249425 AT usw-ex0102-016 DOT remarq DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: is.elta.co.il Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: news.netvision.net.il 948184168 11858 199.203.121.2 (18 Jan 2000 08:29:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jan 2000 08:29:28 GMT X-Sender: eliz AT is In-Reply-To: <000b8d9b.bd249425@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Charlie wrote: > What front ends are available for gdb to give an interface more like > Visual C++? I had a very quick play with fsdb but it didn't seem to > like C++ exceptions. I need the debugger to also work well with > templates. Please read chapter 12 of the DJGPP FAQ list, it has some recommendations for C++ debugging, especially in sections 12.1 and 12.5. > I've used RHIDE up till now, but it seems a little flaky in debugging Care to explain what problems did you see? We cannot help you without knowing the details. ``Flaky'' is not enough. > and doesn't appear to be maintained. How so? A new beta was announced less than a month ago.