From: jazir <entropic AT mpx DOT com DOT au>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: GCC bugs
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:38:18 +1100
Organization: Optus Internet
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <3884186A.ACD7741A@mpx.com.au>
References: <01bf611a$9c6e9500$LocalHost AT alex> <3883BCC2 DOT 2CC1DCD9 AT a DOT crl DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wdcax1-174.dialup.optusnet.com.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news1.mpx.com.au 948184391 12248 198.142.246.174 (18 Jan 2000 08:33:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT mpx DOT com DOT au
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jan 2000 08:33:11 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

hey all,

> The GCC documentation says clearly that a GCC crash under any
> circumstance, with legal or illegal source code, is considered a bug.
> If you can reproduce the crash, report a bug with ways to reproduce the
> behavior.
> 
> --
> Weiqi Gao
> weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com

this should be right, but when i reported an internal compiler error they
just blamed me for using M$ operating systems, and sed the msg usually
indicated a hardware problem.  

love,
jazir :)
(daniel)