From: mikegee AT creator DOT dp DOT ua (Mike Gee) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Porting Watcom 11.0 to djgpp Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 01:34:16 +0200 Organization: ISP "Creator OnLine" Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <853fat$5q4$1 AT bgtnsc03 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <3875D12C DOT F6931CFF AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <8559hr$49a$1 AT bgtnsc02 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <855ckh$ptl$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <855qoe$au9$1 AT bgtnsc01 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> NNTP-Posting-Host: mttym.dnepr.net.ua X-Trace: ontario.dnepr.net.ua 947288208 25282 195.248.169.88 (7 Jan 2000 23:36:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT dnepr DOT net DOT ua NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jan 2000 23:36:48 GMT X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.12 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article <855qoe$au9$1 AT bgtnsc01 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net>, Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:45:26 -0800, "Charles Wood" says... > The fact that it can't assemble the tons of asm code that I haven't touched > for a year is terrible. Write it once, forget about it. Not true here. > > Not to mention the quantity of inline assembler I use in the hardware > sections. You may want to check out NASM (http://www.cryogen.com/Nasm) and look up FAQ 17.2 "Converting between AT&T and Intel assembly") -- Best regards, Mike