From: "Damian Yerrick" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: Subject: Re: Why did ID choose DJGPP for Quake? Lines: 25 Organization: Pin Eight Software X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Message-ID: X-Trace: /Kw5eDxP2In9cG3PHomro175ULEnhgQp5cWPHWmzVXv+qd5Tr59wCoss3+SkQVmuZ11qrG78AnIJ!6fz42Py9aDEj4AyYHdPi6mX3OmrGmJaRrzhyysFDhRFel/nkSyVg5gU9Jl3NGGdz/oRy3Ys= X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 17:23:24 GMT Distribution: world Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 17:23:24 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote: > > I might be wrong but I don't think there would be any on this > > newsgroup using a 386+287 for serious work in 2000. 386 PCs? No. Their BIOSes probably have the century bug. > You would be wrong. Especially in embedded systems. > The only reason we don't compile with -mpentium is because > we still didn't switch to GCC 2.9x for building the library, and > versions of GCC before 2.9x didn't support Pentium-specific > optimizations. Then I guess I'll have to recompile everything from sources myself once the next DJGPP version is released, as one of my systems is 486SX-based. -- Damian Yerrick http://yerricde.tripod.com/ View full .sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html