From: Weiqi Gao <weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: djgpp strangeness
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:36:54 -0600
Organization: CRL Network Services
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <386279D6.61CBA599@a.crl.com>
References: <tmU74.34$Fc6 DOT 1542 AT weber DOT videotron DOT net> <14684.897$Qz2 DOT 16629 AT wagner DOT videotron DOT net> <Yue84.371$36 DOT 7194 AT carnaval DOT risq DOT qc DOT ca> <38618321 DOT 667C7F69 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <iis84.536$36 DOT 12170 AT carnaval DOT risq DOT qc DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a116022.stl1.as.crl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Alain Magloire wrote:
> 
> No, that is not my point, the point is malloc()/free() will not
> call the constructor or destructor of a class, reread the post.

I understand you perfectly: calling malloc()/free() will not call
constructors and destructors.  What I'm saying is that that may not be
enough to explain the bug.

-- 
Weiqi Gao
weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com