From: "Damian Yerrick" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <380282EA DOT 3E6A AT earthlink DOT net> <38063D49 DOT 12D7 AT earthlink DOT net> Subject: Re: allegro gone missing? Lines: 30 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: X-Trace: /ba9QfifJhz3Fw4l8Y8DVMwO5Jp1bOkgTIF0V6Nd2e5RmC9ANZNCtLicEfngiiFHg1h6yH98YlSq!JCZT8vU/Ga/wAxMPG8aipMwocj+hVaRgRW41uz4MyAsngO354SRRklIdfMAl590iF9UpdfGcRA== X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 05:02:35 GMT Distribution: world Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 05:02:35 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote in message news:Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991017141953 DOT 25053R-100000 AT is... Where is il? > > Even a program that does nothing except being parked in an idle loop > involves the DPMI server, since there's a timer tick every 55 msec, > which triggers a mode switch (to reflect the interrupt to its default > real-mode handler). > > In addition, if the setup of the machine under the two DPMI servers > being compared is different, it might well be that the difference has > nothing to do with the DPMI server per se. For example, if one > configuration runs the machine in V86 mode and the other in the true > real mode, the mode-switch overhead is *much* larger in the real-mode > setup, no matter what DPMI host is in use. Oh, BTW, Eli meant the mode switches between real and protected mode that happen hundreds or thousands of times a second, several times each interrupt. -- Damian Yerrick CM 398, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology 5500 Wabash Ave Terre Haute, IN 47803 http://come.to/yerrick