Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 14:10:05 +0200
From: Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: EXE format
Message-ID: <19990924141005.E1496@crater.eth.ericsson.se>
References: <37E6A0B0 DOT 9246A756 AT tudor21 DOT net> <963 DOT 990923 AT Phreaker DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
In-Reply-To: <963.990923@Phreaker.net>; from Batchex on Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 01:31:45AM +0700
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 01:31:45AM +0700, Batchex wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I've searched wotsit.org and only finds win31 exe
> format (NE-EXE). What I need is win9x exe format (PE-EXE, or is PE &
> NE exe is the same???). I've looked into the win95 exe(s) with a
> HexEditor, and find PE instead of NE (like the one described in
> wotsit.org docs).

No, PE and NE are not the same format. Check out the source code of
Wine, you can find lots of useful info in it about both formats.

http://www.winehq.com/

HTH,Laszlo