From: michael AT toobie DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (Michael Kearns) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc Subject: Re: An updated DOS - Please discuss Organization: none Message-ID: <37e6379c.13818700@news-reader.bt.net> References: <37d7913a DOT 10901976 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <37d8570d$0$14670 AT mojo DOT crosslink DOT net> <37d9bd34 DOT 955844 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <7rfieg$70a$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net> <37DC0C7A DOT 56537E8C AT btinternet DOT com> <37dcadd6 DOT 336383 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <37DDB06A DOT ADDF2D34 AT Mindless DOT com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 41 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 11:56:06 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.75.234.2 X-Trace: newreader.ukcore.bt.net 937310244 194.75.234.2 (Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:57:24 BST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:57:24 BST To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:18:18 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote: > > >aw AT mail1 DOT bet1 DOT puv DOT fi wrote: > >> michael AT toobie DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (Michael Kearns) wrote: >> > >> > My knowledge of Linux isn't as good as it should be, but whenever I have >> > used it, it has the following 'aspects' which I don't see as very DOS-like. >> > >> > Boot time - This is generally quite long, even compared to windows. > >Coming in kinda off on this... > >This depends on what you consider boot-time to mean. If you mean from the time >the BIOS Hands over to the boot loder and the boot loader has the kernel in a >state where it can go multi-user then Linux is extremely short. If you consider >this to be until the Login prompt is and all services are started Linux still >wins because NT pops the login box up before it even gets its networking up. > >IT's hard to define boot-time properly especially where NT fires itself up and >opens a login box whilest trying to initialize everything else. > >> >> >> Well, not compared to windows NT. > >I'll agree, NT on my P-133 takes 3-4x longer to boot than Linux on my DX2/66. >(And it takes some time to mount a 30Gig EXT2FS filesystem!) Apologies. As I mentioned in another thread, I should not have used Windows as an example, as everyone quotes NT time which isn't particularly good as a control. regards, Michael.