From: Rez Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: WARNING: DOS is about to die. Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 22:46:20 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7quo1t$94k$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu> <37D2ECE3 DOT 9BB2B63E AT unb DOT ca> <37D46EBF DOT 22AAC1C4 AT hmc DOT edu> <37D4C3D4 DOT 6E09 AT earthlink DOT net> <7r4hgc$6hs$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu> <37D5F094 DOT DD749246 AT unb DOT ca> <37D68324 DOT 2490FCFA AT unb DOT ca> X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-ELN-Date: 9 Sep 1999 05:43:30 GMT X-ELN-Insert-Date: Wed Sep 8 22:45:15 1999 Organization: Offworld Press Lines: 25 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust20.tnt2.lancaster.ca.da.uu.net Message-ID: <37D749AC.2DB6@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win16; I) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Endlisnis wrote: > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > In a nutshell, access to sources doesn't necessarily mean that everybody > > will want to start their own development based on that source. Most > > people will still need binaries, support for solving problems, etc. Yes. After all 99% of users produce a baffled stare at the mere phrase "source code". > I agree with what you say, but I don't think that MS does. I doubt they > would every allow any current code to the public without extensive monatary > compensation. Considering that M$ still throws a fit if some abandonware site has Windows 1.0 available for download, I also find it highly doubtful. The biggest thieves are always the most paranoid of being stolen from. :/ IMO what they and many other companies should do is offer their old/unsupported software for dl themselves, because after all if someone tries it and likes it they might BUY an upgrade (free advertising!), and at worst they lose nothing by doing so and gain much public goodwill (witness Borland's recent offering of old Turbo C and Pascal versions). ~REZ~