From: Dave Bird <dave AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Assembly tutorial
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 08:53:58 +0100
Organization: ARS HakeMongers inc...... ><_'> <_"
Message-ID: <V1OHICAW0iz3Ewd5@xemu.demon.co.uk>
References: <7pmoef$mjm$1 AT wanadoo DOT fr> <37CDAFCA DOT 944E93A7 AT swipnet DOT se>
 <37CDC58A DOT A8B0CEBA AT hmc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 936302649 nnrp-09:27387 NO-IDENT xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT demon DOT net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01  <dQumtnY$x4rJ2u5tL5fS$n2vuP>
Lines: 13
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <37CDC58A DOT A8B0CEBA AT hmc DOT edu>, Nate Eldredge
<neldredge AT hmc DOT edu> writes
>> You should really consider using NASM instead, unless
>> you want your code to look cryptic :)
>
>Didn't C look cryptic before you learned it?

No, PL/M looked cryptic which is why I learned C instead.


-- 
   ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^   http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/
        (..)__u     news:alt.smoking.mooses