Sender: root AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <3767CDA4.99E7E7EA@inti.gov.ar>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 13:15:32 -0300
From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language: es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: allegro AT canvaslink DOT com
CC: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com,
        balug-lst AT balug DOT org DOT ar
Subject: Re: [AL] Compilers comparisson, some opinions about the generated , 
 assembler
References: <47568953 DOT 6 DOT 19732 AT mx1-13 DOT onmedia DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Tom St Denis wrote:

> btw, what is this thread (in the subject) actualy about?  testing
> compilers or windows?

Compilers ;-)), Eli just asked about slow downs and validity of results under
Windows. My answer is: no, the values of the assembler analysis aren't affected
by Windows. Only the K6-2 could be affected, but only some of the runs because I
verified some of them re-running in DOS. I'll also replace the values by
DOS+CWSDPMI results.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013