From: XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Floating point..... I think....
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:24:56 GMT
Organization: Telefonica Transmision de Datos
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <37662f1d.915507@noticias.iies.es>
References: <01beb63f$a8e494a0$fc4484ce AT sub>
NNTP-Posting-Host: iies248.iies.es
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

El día 14 Jun 1999 08:28:18 GMT, "0/0" <nsousbpoanmer AT naooslp DOT com>
escribió:

>looked more accurate, when I compiled for DJGPP the DFT came out blurry,
>and the FFT came out even weirder and definetly not accurate...but I am

What are you calling DFT and FFT? DFT is a transformation, and FFT is
an algorithm to implement DFT, so how is it that you seem to have
separate functions for DFT and FFT?

I have used FFT and IFFT myself for an audio spectrum analyzer and
they worked as expected. I checked the results against Matlab. And
AFAIK, I tried both float and double with no noticeable difference.

Regards,
GUILLE
----
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (ya sabes :-)