From: "Stefan Viljoen" <rylan AT intekom DOT co DOT za>
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: putpixel method
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 09:35:19 +0300
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Default
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E10sjT0-0005Hf-00@smtp.intekom.co.za>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

----------
> From: Lars S. Loevlie <larssl AT online DOT no>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Subject: putpixel method
> Date: Monday, May 31, 1999 8:09 PM
> 
> Can anyone explain to me (in a very basic way) how to use the
> putpixel-method in djgpp c, and wether writing directly to video-memory
> is actually risky or not? Some say it is and some say not...

Take a look at the MADSQUARE file or most of the other programs I have on
my wWW site's programming page. There is a quick tut in MADSQUARE using
NASM to directly access video ram. To see how to do it in native DJGPP C,
check out the plasma demo source.

This message courtesy of
RylanNet rylan AT intekom DOT co DOT za
http://home.intekom.com/rylan/
--
StarWars for ever!.