Sender: root AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <375E9B01.FEA3324@inti.gov.ar>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 13:49:05 -0300
From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language: es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Hello World and File size
References: <8D53104ECD0CD211AF4000A0C9D60AE30141E446 AT probe-2 DOT acclaim-euro DOT net> <19990609111727 DOT 16923 DOT 00002561 AT ng-fz1 DOT aol DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

R124c4u2 wrote:

> I have no idea how to prune that list of DLLs that have never been used, will
> never be used, and shouldn't have been put there in the first place.

In Linux the package manager (dpkg, rpm, etc.) keeps track of the dynamic
libraries. You can know what programs need each library and the installer can
know if a library can be de-installed, or upgraded without affecting other
programs.
As you can see the fault is in M$ and not in the DLLs itself ;-)
One interesting thing in Windows is that some programs upgrades the kernel
(replacing some DLLs and VXDs) and you don't even know about it. So installing a
new program in your system can make it much more unstable because nobody knows
how the "upgrade" will affect other programs.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013