Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 10:19:47 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: More questions on uclock
In-Reply-To: <3723a79b.1763260@noticias.iies.es>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990428101914.25283N-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:

> >Yes.  `usleep' doesn't call `uclock' at all, btw, so I'm puzzled why
> >did you think there should be any connection.
> 
> I don't have the sources

IMHO, you should.  You would be surprised what freedom does a free
access to sources give you as a programmer.  The source archive fits
on a 1.4 floppy, and you don't even have to unzip it, what with all
the tools nowadays that let you look into compressed archive members.