Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 14:02:56 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Stuart Moore <stuart_moore AT my-dejanews DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... FreeDos? DJ-DOS? Linux?
In-Reply-To: <7el3lq$j9k$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990411140236.28502R-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Stuart Moore wrote:

> I thought DJGPP/GCC lacked support for certain vital interrupts (24h was one
> if I recall correctly)

This isn't true.  Int 24h *is* supported, it just works differently
with different DPMI servers.