Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:58:04 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... ?
In-Reply-To: <199903281542.KAA00365@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990329145746.9091F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 28 Mar 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> > These are all okay, but I have a much more prosaic wish: would
> > somebody please work on adding the missing functions from the 2 ISO
> > Appendices to the C89 standard, and also the ones planned for the
> > upcoming C9x standard?
> 
> Is there an official source for what these standards are?

ISO appendices to C89 are part of the official standard, so I'd expect
them to be in the references published by the respective
organizations.  At least ISO should have them.  Another place to look
for them is at dinkumware site.

As for C9x, there's a draft that's available through the net.  I have
it and can dig out the URL (the URL was posted several times on this
forum, so mail-archives should have it).