Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:25:12 +0200
From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Message-Id: <199903291025.MAA21266@acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Organization: RWTH Aachen, III. physikalisches Institut B
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <199903281542 DOT KAA00365 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> you wrote:

> > These are all okay, but I have a much more prosaic wish: would
> > somebody please work on adding the missing functions from the 2 ISO
> > Appendices to the C89 standard, and also the ones planned for the
> > upcoming C9x standard?

> Is there an official source for what these standards are?

Of course there is. The 'Appendices to C89' are actually one
Amendment, and two 'Technical Corrigenda'. For C9x, there's only a
'considered-final' draft being circulated to the national
standardization bodies, as of yet.

Both of these are available in electronic form:

	http://anubis.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/

That's the somewhat official home page of the working group for C9x,
and there's also a link under which the two Technical Corrigenda can
be found.

--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.